Guitar and Violin, Picasso, 1912.
George Braque was known for his technique of putting fragmentation into perspective, unlike Picasso Braque used a monochromatic palette and would focus on expanding and manipulating the specific form, rather than the overall impact of space. His purpose was to distract the viewer from the subject of the piece.
Fruitdish and Glass, papier collé and charcoal on paper, George Braque, 1912.
Semoiselles D'Avignon, Picasso, 1907.
Picasso and Braque often worked together aiming to combine their own individual perspectives together, regardless of the result wanted; the work was often a fragmentation of abstract forms.
Their style of working (and the movement itself) was influenced by the artist Paul Cezanne, who was known for introducing views from different perspectives. What specifically inspired Picasso and Braque was how Cezanne would visually transform what he saw and broke it down into its simplest form. The geometry involved. This is what inspired the two artists to manipulate, to transform and fully visually explore what they saw, but most importantly the technique of fragmenting and redefining an object with the different perspectives involved.
Maison Maria on the way to the Château Noir. Paul Cezanne,1895.
There were two types of cubist approaches, one known as analytic cubism which was trying to show the object not as the eye perceives them, but the way the mind views and reflects the object. The other was known as Synthetic cubism which was composed of simpler forms but in brighter colours.
It was also during this art movement that the technique of collage was introduced, unifying different elements to represent an entire message and visual journey within the piece. It was Picasso and Braque who were the first to make collages. The basis of collage was to deconstruct an object into components that were then reconstructed to unify the fragmented pieces to create an overall abstract piece.
Bottle of Vieux Marc, Glass, Guitar and Newspaper. Picasso,1913.
Cubist constructions were very influential as they influenced a lot of ideas that were seen later in modern art, which was the use of real life objects as part of an art piece, This was relevant as it changed the perception of what an art piece is.
Guitare. Picasso,1924.
Cubism links to the theme deconstruction in many ways, from the way objects are fragmented into abstract forms, to how they are simply deconstructed and then reconstructed to take upon another form and purpose. It has a value of expressionism that I believe links with my project proposal of testing the linguistic philosophy of deconstructive architecture.